According
to:
Epperson, Bruce D.: More Important Than the Music. A History of Jazz Discography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 2013.
Where do
you look up information about jazz, blues, gospel and all that ja…ngling music,
I mean besides just googling yourself to death in a pool of abundant,
half-reliable information? Where do you go where the information, however
correct it might be, doesn’t feel sticky?
In discographies? Which ones? Epperson’s book on the topic, More Important Than the Music (2013), is
fascinating. Sure, from one perspective, it gives you an abundance of facts, of
nerdy information about nerds and their nerdy obsessions, it painstakingly
records who published which list of jazz records at what time under what
circumstances. That is the purely fact-driven aspect. On the other hand, it introduces
you to a world of people whipped by their desires, bound together in love and
hatred for the topic and for each other, stuck in decade-long feuds about
plagiarism, money, mutual criticism and appraisal, a world full of projects
only making it from the letters A to K because of over-ambition, corporate
enemies or new technology. A world full of hope and despair, of half-arbitrary
decisions about race, genre, cut-off dates, band formats and sound formats, driven
by personal interest of the respective researcher. A world of necessary, but
neither academically nor financially rewarded research, with no sustainable way
to make it profitable. I don’t know if Epperson realises just how hilarious his
chosen quote to end the book is, where Howard Rye says:
The single biggest factor in jazz discography is that neither Brian Rust nor Jørgen Jepsen gave a damn about the needs of those who wouldn’t buy their books!
(Rye in Epperson 2013, 212).
Talk about
an exclamation point to end a book about, well, lists. This is not how a tragedy ends (or a comedy, or a romance)
– this is how you end a farce, a book with farcical subject matter, intentionally or not. As I said somewhere
else: A discography is but a list made by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
signifying nothing. (Including myself, of course, although the only ‚discographies‘
I create consist of second-hand information and aim at cutting the corners of
availability).
Below is a
list of the jazz discographies that Epperson discusses more than just in
passing and around which he constructs entire chapters or paragraphs.
Epperson’s book is an eloquent, informative and fluid (and at times hilarious)
read from a historical/narrative perspective, but it doesn’t have registers
telling you which discographies or names are discussed on what pages, and which
chapters and paragraphs deal with which time spans exactly etc. (actually, in the
text, the chapter titles do indicate time spans, but they don’t do this where
it would be most useful: in the „contents“ overview). So I assembled a list
according to Epperson’s chronology with some of the crucial quotes for each
discography. The list only treats general
jazz (and blues) discographies, meaning there are no specialized discographies: no label discographies, no single-artist
bio-discographies, no solographies (yes, those exist), no national
discographies and so forth.
Since
discographies tend to have shifting titles, different editors/authors, changing
time spans and volatile edition histories, I somewhat lump the titles and
publication years for the discographies together. The gist of each work’s
identity will be researchable with this, if you want to dig into it. Or just
read the book.
Chapter 2.2:
Schleman, Hilton: Rhythm on Record (1936)
The lack of session-level information has led many discographers to relegate Rhythm on Record to protodiscography, leaving the honors of „first discography“ to Delaunay’s Hot Discography, which appeared three months later.However, within the limited goals he set for himself, Schleman was largely successful, an discographers were still using his book some sixty-five years later.
(Epperson 2013, 29)
Chapter 2.3:
Delaunay, Charles: Hot Discography (1936)
„Charles Delaunay is the undoubted father of discography as we know it today,“ adds Sheatsley. „It was he who first saw and utilized the importance of master numbers.“
(Epperson 2013, 38)
Chapter 3.1:
Blackstone, Orin: Index to Jazz (1945–1950)
Therefore he stuck to an alphabetical-by-artist structure from start to finish, unlike Delaunay’s affinities of style arrangement.
(Epperson 2013, 51)
Chapter 3.2:
Delaunay, Charles: New Hot Discography (1948)
Recognizably a Delaunay product, it retained the affinities of style approach for musicians recorded before 1930 but abandoned it for later artists, who were grouped in straight alphabetical order in a long section of their own.
(Epperson 2013, 56)
One other prescient feature of New Hot Discography bears mentioning in some detail. Each issue (usually, but not always, a 78 rpm, two-sided single) was assigned a „discode“, a Delaunay-assigned serial number comprising a number, letter, and number.
(Epperson 2013, 59)
Chapter 3.4:
Carey, David, Albert McCarthy (and Ralph Venable): The Directory of Recorded Jazz and Swing Music [The Jazz Directory] (1949–1955)
McCarthy, Albert and
Dave Carey: The
Directory of Recorded Jazz and Swing Music Inlcuding Gospel and Blues Records
[The Jazz Directory]. (1955–1957)
The discographic format wasn’t radically different from that of the contemporaneous Blackstone or Delaunay works, but it was crisper and clearer, mostly because, once and for all, it subordinated matrix numbers to recording sessions arranged in a chronological format.
(Epperson 2013, 69)
Chapter 3.5:
Delaunay, Charles and Kurt Mohr: Hot discographie encyclopédique (1951–1952)
The format of Hot discographie encyclopédique (HDE) was a complete break with any of Delaunay’s previous works and bore a strong resemblance to Carey and McCarthy’s series, so it instantly became known as the „French Jazz Directory„. Delaunay admitted that the times had changed and „such a work as this must be objective, not selective.“
(Epperson 2013, 76)
Chapter 4.1:
Rust, Brian: Jazz Records, A–Z (1961)
Although this session-based layout was not radically different from that in The Jazz Directory, the refinements he did develop ended up making Jazz Records, A–Z so superior to anything that came before that it was eventually called the Rust format.
(Epperson 2013, 85)
Where did you go for availability, not history? […] Even Malcolm Shaw, who edited the latest (2002) edition of Rust’s Jazz Records, A–Z, admits that „JR [Jazz Records] as it stands is probably due for a total reconsideration of the concept“.
(Epperson 2013, 4)
Chapter 4.2:
Jepsen, Jørgen Grunnet: Jazz Records, 1942–196X (1963–1970)
Survival demanded a relatively straightforward editorial policy. „This is not a complete listing of all jazz records,“ cautioned Jepsen. „This is only an attempt to list all the records known to the editor and his collaborators.“
(Epperson 2013, 89)
Chapter 4.3:
Godrich, John and Robert Dixon: Blues and Gospel Records, 1902–1942 (1964, 1969)
Dixon, Robert and John
Godrich: Blues
and Gospel Records, 1902–1943 (1982)
– and Howard Rye: Blues and Gospel Records,
1890–1943 (1997)
The decision to include all existing material without differentiating whether it was commercial or archival (and whether or not it was relevant to record collectors) proved to be the single most important metric by which Blues and Gospel Records came to be evaluated over the years.
(Epperson 2013, 94)
Chapter 4.5:
Leadbitter, Mike and Neil Slaven: Blues Records, 1943–1966: An Encyclopedic Discography to More Than Two Decades of Recorded Blues (1968)
–: Blues
Records, 1943–1970: A Selective Discography. Vol. 1, A–K. (1987)
–: Blues
Records, 1943–1970: A Selective Discography. Vol. 2, L–Z. (1994).
The few who did review the 1987 revision generally considered it a significant improvement over its 1968 predecessor. Everyone agreed that its new subtitle A Selective Discography, was a far more realistic description that the first edition’s unfortunate Encyclopedic Discography label.
(Epperson 2013, 101)
Chapter 5.1:
Bruyninckx, Walter: 50 Years of Recorded Jazz. 1917–1967. (ca. 1968–1971)
–: 60
Years of Recorded Jazz. 1917–1977 (ca. 1977–1980)
–: 70/75
Years of Recorded Jazz. (late 1980s to early 1990s)
– and Domi Truffandier: 85 Years of Recorded Jazz. (CD-ROM 2003)
„Despite his continued plagiarism,“ recalled librarian Matthew Snyder, „by the late 1980’s [sic] the general opinion on Bruyninckx appeared to be that the improved quality of his work, combined with his extensive coverage, had produced the best available jazz discography.“
(Epperson 2013, 113)
Chapter 5.2:
Raben, Erik: Jazz Records, 1942–80: A Discography. (1989–2007, A–G. Unfinished)
Everyone agreed that its musicians index, included at the end of each volume and not as an appendix at the end of the series, was much needed and badly overdue […].
(Epperson 2013, 117)
Chapter 5.3:
Lord, Tom: The Jazz Discography. (1992–2002)
„It is possible that Lord’s project has already taken over the market for Raben’s volumes, and that Raben’s project will die. This possibility, in combination with the frustrations of using Bruyninckx’s paperbacks and his inept marketing of 70 Years, may mean that that, in jazz discography’s own little version of a hostile corporate takeover, Lord’s project has already emerged the victor.“ [Kernfeld/Rye]
(Epperson 2013, 125)
Lord was a businessman, a marketer who was peddling a product – the others were either professional academics or amateur scholars undertaking research. […] „Lord is more of a collator than a researcher,“ observed Edward Berger […].
(Epperson 2013, 126)
(note that
this Tom Lord has no relation to the Tom Lord who made 1976’s Clarence
Williams-discography)
The notable
Websites and Online Articlesthat Epperson lists in his
bibliography are:
http://www.jazzdiscography.com
http://allmusic.com/
http://jazzstudiesonline.org
http://www.jazzarcheology.com
http://www.jazz.com
http://www.redsaunders.com
http://victor.library.ucsb.edu
Antworten